Skip navigation


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2865
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBidkar, K. L.-
dc.contributor.authorPhalak, K. T.-
dc.contributor.authorJadhao, P. D.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T06:17:41Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-11T06:17:41Z-
dc.date.issued2015-04-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://192.168.3.232:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2865-
dc.description.abstractThe wide range of flow measuring devices are available for use in Open Channels. In absence of guide line and recommendations, it is difficult for the field staff to s elect a particular type of measuring device. It is particularly more true in the case of measuring small discharge (upto 40 lit/sec.) Therefore, a comparative study for evaluating different types of devices for measuring discharge upto 40 lit/sec. (lps) was undertaken as adaptive research. Partial flume, cutthroat flume, Board creasted Weir RBC (Portable) flume s tanding Wave flume and 90° - V Notch were selected for the study as these are commonly used in construction, use and maintenance, experiments were carried out in the Open Channel. Broad Creasted Weir (replogle) of 20 cm sill height tops the list followed by 90° V- n otch and portable standing wave Flume.en_US
dc.subjectLow dischargeen_US
dc.subjectfield channel.en_US
dc.subjectPartial flumeen_US
dc.subjectcut-throat flumeen_US
dc.subjectBoard creasted Weir RBC (Portable) flume standing Wave flume and 90° - V Notchen_US
dc.titleComparative Study of Flow Measuring Devices for Low Dischargeen_US
Appears in Collections:Civil

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparative Study of Flow Measuring Devices.pdf82.62 kBUnknownView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.